<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Christopher J. Umina &#187; Computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uminac.com/category/computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uminac.com</link>
	<description>I'm not creative enough for this, and you can't help me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Aleratec Cruiser Mini Disk Cloner</title>
		<link>http://uminac.com/2010/02/23/aleratec-cruiser-mini-disk-cloner/</link>
		<comments>http://uminac.com/2010/02/23/aleratec-cruiser-mini-disk-cloner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aleratec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aleratec cruiser mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cruiser mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disk cloner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uminac.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We ordered one of these little Aleratec Disk Cloner things about 2 or 3 months ago.  It finally came yesterday.
The thing works nicely, it accepts laptop &#038; desktop SATA drives and clones with one button push.
It cloned a 160GB deathstar in about an hour, which isn&#8217;t bad for that junky of a drive.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We ordered one of these little Aleratec Disk Cloner things about 2 or 3 months ago.  It finally came yesterday.</p>
<p>The thing works nicely, it accepts laptop &#038; desktop SATA drives and clones with one button push.</p>
<p>It cloned a 160GB deathstar in about an hour, which isn&#8217;t bad for that junky of a drive.  I just wish it had a secure erase function&#8230; </p>
<p><img src="http://www.imgfixr.com/image/1648" alt="The disk cloner with disks in it..." /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uminac.com/2010/02/23/aleratec-cruiser-mini-disk-cloner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using portdowngrade</title>
		<link>http://uminac.com/2010/02/09/using-portdowngrade/</link>
		<comments>http://uminac.com/2010/02/09/using-portdowngrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portaudit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portdowngrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portsdb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portupgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uminac.com/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, I needed to roll a port back to a much older revision.  While I usually dislike this type of thing, I found it to be necessary this time.  Somebody recommended that I use portdowngrade to revert the ports tree to the older version, so I could install it.
Here&#8217;s my process:
Verify Anonymous CVS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I needed to roll a port back to a much older revision.  While I usually dislike this type of thing, I found it to be necessary this time.  Somebody recommended that I use portdowngrade to revert the ports tree to the older version, so I could install it.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my process:</p>
<h3>Verify Anonymous CVS Connectivity</h3>
<p>First, you must verify that you can connect to the anoncvs server.  You can find instructions in the <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/anoncvs.html">FreeBSD Handbook</a> for this process.</p>
<p>One thing you should probably be aware of is that there are a very limited number of anoncvs mirrors, which is why I chose the .tw one.</p>
<h3>Prepare Your Ports Tree</h3>
<p>You need to be sure that you have an updated portsdb installed so portdowngrade is able to find the matching ports with a search.</p>
<pre>portsdb -u</pre>
<h3>Installing &#038; Using portdowngrade</h3>
<pre>cd /usr/ports/*/portdowngrade &#038;&#038; make DEFAULT_CVS_SERVER=\":pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.tw.freebsd.org:/home/ncvs\" install clean</pre>
<p>Note that you may replace the server name with whichever mirror you chose in the earlier step.</p>
<p>Once installed, you may now downgrade the port using:</p>
<pre>portdowngrade devel/bugzilla</pre>
<p>for instance.  From here the <a href="http://portdowngrade.sourceforge.net/documentation.html">documentation</a> will be more than enough to show you how to get the downgraded port checked out and installed.</p>
<h3>The Missing Step: Making portupgrade Ignore the Port!</h3>
<p>This is easy as pie, but there are two ways to do it.  I chose to do both.</p>
<h4>Option 1: Edit the pkgtools.conf file</h4>
<p>Usually located in /usr/local/etc/, pkgtools.conf will allow you to specify an additional port in the HOLD_PKGS array like such:</p>
<pre>
HOLD_PKGS = [
    'bsdpan-*',
    'devel/bugzilla*'
]
</pre>
<h4>Option 2: +IGNOREME</h4>
<p>Creating a +IGNOREME file in the package directory will stop both portaudit and portmaster from upgrading the port.</p>
<pre>touch /var/db/pkg/bugzilla/+IGNOREME</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uminac.com/2010/02/09/using-portdowngrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thunderbird (3.0.1) update marks messages unread!</title>
		<link>http://uminac.com/2010/01/26/thunderbird-3-0-1-update-marks-messages-unread/</link>
		<comments>http://uminac.com/2010/01/26/thunderbird-3-0-1-update-marks-messages-unread/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uminac.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a confirmed bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540554
To fix it, you just need to go in the config editor and set
mail.server.default.use_condstore
to false, supposedly.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a confirmed bug: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540554">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540554</a></p>
<p>To fix it, you just need to go in the config editor and set</p>
<pre>mail.server.default.use_condstore</pre>
<p>to false, supposedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uminac.com/2010/01/26/thunderbird-3-0-1-update-marks-messages-unread/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simple ATX Power Supply Test</title>
		<link>http://uminac.com/2009/12/16/simple-atx-power-supply-test/</link>
		<comments>http://uminac.com/2009/12/16/simple-atx-power-supply-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uminac.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a simple way to test that an ATX power supply is functional (or dead).
ATX Power Supply Test
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a simple way to test that an ATX power supply is functional (or dead).</p>
<p><a href="http://uminac.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/ATX-Power-test.pdf">ATX Power Supply Test</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uminac.com/2009/12/16/simple-atx-power-supply-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>vSphere 4 Client &amp; Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://uminac.com/2009/11/06/vsphere-4-client-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://uminac.com/2009/11/06/vsphere-4-client-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powershell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsupported]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vsphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uminac.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has been fixed as of update 1.
If you&#8217;ve tried to install the vSphere client on Windows 7, you&#8217;ve undoubtedly come across errors like the following:

Error parsing the server "192.168.2.2" "clients.xml" file.
Login will continue, contact your system administrator.

and 

The type initializer for 'VirtualInfrastructure.Utils.HttpWebRequestProxy' threw an exception.

Although Windows 7 is fully released now, nobody seems to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font color="red">This has been fixed as of update 1.</font></b></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve tried to install the vSphere client on Windows 7, you&#8217;ve undoubtedly come across errors like the following:</p>
<pre>
Error parsing the server "192.168.2.2" "clients.xml" file.
Login will continue, contact your system administrator.
</pre>
<p>and </p>
<pre>
The type initializer for 'VirtualInfrastructure.Utils.HttpWebRequestProxy' threw an exception.
</pre>
<p>Although Windows 7 is fully released now, nobody seems to feel like supporting it.  Though, I guess Microsoft did kindof rush it out the door&#8230;  Anyway, there&#8217;s a nice PowerShell script out there that allows you to fix this stupidity.  After browsing the VMWare community, I came across this URL:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tinyint.com/index.php/2009/09/04/vsphere-client-on-windows-7/">http://www.tinyint.com/index.php/2009/09/04/vsphere-client-on-windows-7/</a></p>
<p>I followed the instructions and now everything is working the way it should be.  Maybe VMWare could just&#8230;  do this for you ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uminac.com/2009/11/06/vsphere-4-client-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: FreeBSD&#8217;s iSCSI Initiator</title>
		<link>http://uminac.com/2009/08/03/update-freebsds-iscsi-initiator/</link>
		<comments>http://uminac.com/2009/08/03/update-freebsds-iscsi-initiator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initiator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi.conf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uminac.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well worth mentioning:
There&#8217;s a way more updated version of the iSCSI Initiator on the developer&#8217;s public FTP site.
ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/
With this version I&#8217;m now seeing acceptable IO (around 65MB/s reads/writes) after setting tags=256 in iscsi.conf.
All credits to the developer.
Because I&#8217;m in the US, I have fairly bad connectivity to that site.  I&#8217;ve mirrored it here:
http://uminac.com/mirror/ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well worth mentioning:</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a way more updated version of the iSCSI Initiator on the developer&#8217;s public FTP site.</p>
<p><a href="ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/">ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/</a></p>
<p>With this version I&#8217;m now seeing acceptable IO (around 65MB/s reads/writes) after setting tags=256 in iscsi.conf.</p>
<p>All credits to the developer.</p>
<p>Because I&#8217;m in the US, I have fairly bad connectivity to that site.  I&#8217;ve mirrored it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://uminac.com/mirror/ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/">http://uminac.com/mirror/ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/freebsd/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uminac.com/2009/08/03/update-freebsds-iscsi-initiator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solaris 10&#8217;s native LDAP client and an OpenLDAP server</title>
		<link>http://uminac.com/2009/07/29/solaris-10s-native-ldap-client-and-an-openldap-server/</link>
		<comments>http://uminac.com/2009/07/29/solaris-10s-native-ldap-client-and-an-openldap-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uminac.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After plenty of hours of trying to figure out why it was that Sun&#8217;s native LDAP client wouldn&#8217;t talk to my OpenLDAP server I decided to call support.  I had been through just about every Google result I could read and still got nowhere.
It turns out that when you use the native client you&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After plenty of hours of trying to figure out why it was that Sun&#8217;s native LDAP client wouldn&#8217;t talk to my OpenLDAP server I decided to call support.  I had been through just about every Google result I could read and still got nowhere.</p>
<p>It turns out that when you use the native client you&#8217;re required to make some security concessions.  The LDAP client&#8217;s config files exist only to tell it what server to initially try to connect to.  The server it initially connects to MUST allow non-TLS queries to get some session information from the directory.  The session information has to be in a specific form, and contain specific information.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have time for a proper tutorial right now, but I will post the document Sun sent to me.</p>
<p><a href="http://uminac.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/openldap-65774196-1.pdf">Using Sun&#8217;s native LDAP client or OpenLDAP&#8217;s client to query an OpenLDAP server on Solaris 10</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uminac.com/2009/07/29/solaris-10s-native-ldap-client-and-an-openldap-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Scoop on FreeBSD &amp; iSCSI (Currently)</title>
		<link>http://uminac.com/2009/07/17/the-scoop-on-freebsd-iscsi-currently/</link>
		<comments>http://uminac.com/2009/07/17/the-scoop-on-freebsd-iscsi-currently/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8.0-BETA1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscontrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi-target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi_initiator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uminac.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please see the update to this post
As A Target (Server)
The only available iSCSI target software in FreeBSD is the /net/iscsi-target port.  This is the iSCSI target from OpenBSD and is absolutely not suitable for production use (or even most non-production uses).
Problems I&#8217;ve come across:

Does not support CHAP.
Will not allow multiple connections to the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uminac.com/2009/08/03/update-freebsds-iscsi-initiator/"><b><font color="red">Please see the update to this post</font></b></a></p>
<h3>As A Target (Server)</h3>
<p>The only available iSCSI target software in FreeBSD is the <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/net/iscsi-target/pkg-descr">/net/iscsi-target</a> port.  This is the iSCSI target from OpenBSD and is absolutely not suitable for production use (or even most non-production uses).</p>
<p><b>Problems I&#8217;ve come across:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Does not support CHAP.</li>
<li>Will not allow multiple connections to the same target (LUN).  This is useful in the case of VMWare ESX/ESXi.</li>
<li>Cannot rehash configuration file.  If you add/remove a target you must restart the daemon completely, ending all current connections.</li>
</ul>
<h3>As An Initiator (Client)</h3>
<p>The iSCSI initiator in FreeBSD 7.2 (currently) suffers from many issues.  These issues prevent it from being suitable for production use.  There is, however, a newer version of the iscsi_initiator kernel module shipping in 8.0-BETA1 and the -current branch (HEAD).  By nature these versions of the FreeBSD operating system are not suitable for production use.</p>
<p><b>Problems I&#8217;ve come across in FreeBSD 7.2:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>No official documentation.  While it is a simple configuration, you have to find procedures strewn about the web.</li>
<li>Poor performance without tags tweak.  I achieved no better than 2MB/s transfer rate without setting <i>tags = 256</i> in <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=iscsi.conf&#038;apropos=0&#038;sektion=0&#038;manpath=FreeBSD+7.2-RELEASE&#038;format=html">iscsi.conf</a>.</li>
<li>No <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=rc&#038;apropos=0&#038;sektion=0&#038;manpath=FreeBSD+7.2-RELEASE&#038;format=html">rc</a> scripts.  Devices must be attached after boot by admin or <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=cron&#038;apropos=0&#038;sektion=0&#038;manpath=FreeBSD+7.2-RELEASE&#038;format=html">cron</a>.</li>
<li>System lockups under loads.  Copying files to the iSCSI array via gigabit has repeatedly locked the system up.  To test I copied the files from a local disk to the array and had the same result.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Problems I&#8217;ve come across in FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>It includes an updated version, but it just flat out doesn&#8217;t work.  When attaching the target with <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=iscontrol&#038;apropos=0&#038;sektion=0&#038;manpath=FreeBSD+7.2-RELEASE&#038;format=html">iscontrol</a> -n targetname the <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=iscontrol&#038;apropos=0&#038;sektion=0&#038;manpath=FreeBSD+7.2-RELEASE&#038;format=html">iscontrol</a> process hangs forever and cannot be <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=kill&#038;apropos=0&#038;sektion=0&#038;manpath=FreeBSD+7.2-RELEASE&#038;format=html">kill</a>ed with a -9.</li>
<li>Still no <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=rc&#038;apropos=0&#038;sektion=0&#038;manpath=FreeBSD+7.2-RELEASE&#038;format=html">rc</a> scripts of any kind.</li>
</ul>
<p>Comments are welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uminac.com/2009/07/17/the-scoop-on-freebsd-iscsi-currently/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PowerEdge 2900 iSCSI Performance Problems w/ FreeBSD</title>
		<link>http://uminac.com/2009/06/19/poweredge-2900-iscsi-performance-problems-w-freebsd/</link>
		<comments>http://uminac.com/2009/06/19/poweredge-2900-iscsi-performance-problems-w-freebsd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horrific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi_initiator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poweredge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[write speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uminac.com/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got a new storage server, it&#8217;s a PE2900 from Dell.  Installed FreeBSD 7.2 on it, rebuilt the kernel with all the updates and included:
options iscsi_initiator
connected to the iSCSI target across the LAN, then I used:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/testiscsi/file.out bs=65536
to test the speeds after mounting it.  I observed horrific speeds (in the range of 300-500KB/s).
To [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a new storage server, it&#8217;s a PE2900 from Dell.  Installed FreeBSD 7.2 on it, rebuilt the kernel with all the updates and included:</p>
<pre>options iscsi_initiator</pre>
<p>connected to the iSCSI target across the LAN, then I used:</p>
<pre>dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/testiscsi/file.out bs=65536</pre>
<p>to test the speeds after mounting it.  I observed horrific speeds (in the range of 300-500KB/s).</p>
<p>To make a long story short, I discovered that using the extra Intel NIC I put in the system&#8217;s PCI slots fixed the problem.  So I tried to upgrade firmware, but they all seem to be up to date.  Looks like I&#8217;ll be disabling them in the BIOS and ordering some more Intel cards.</p>
<p>Damn Dell for putting those crappy Broadcoms in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uminac.com/2009/06/19/poweredge-2900-iscsi-performance-problems-w-freebsd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VLAN Trunking: Cisco vs. Dell</title>
		<link>http://uminac.com/2009/04/26/vlan-trunking-cisco-vsdell/</link>
		<comments>http://uminac.com/2009/04/26/vlan-trunking-cisco-vsdell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gvrp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerconnect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vlan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vlans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uminac.com/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In a recent battle at work I put a Cisco 2960G up against a Dell PowerConnect 5424.  The PowerConnects aren&#8217;t bad&#8230;  They&#8217;re cheap, gigabit, and Layer-2.  Anyway, I quickly found out that unless you use GVRP, the Dell cannot learn what VLANs are out there.  You have to specify allowed VLANS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.imgfixr.com/image/695" align="right" /></p>
<p>In a recent battle at work I put a Cisco 2960G up against a Dell PowerConnect 5424.  The PowerConnects aren&#8217;t bad&#8230;  They&#8217;re cheap, gigabit, and Layer-2.  Anyway, I quickly found out that unless you use GVRP, the Dell cannot learn what VLANs are out there.  You have to specify allowed VLANS specifically on both ends of a trunk.</p>
<p>The Cisco 2960G doesn&#8217;t support GVRP, and VTP is proprietary, so I was forced to use this method.</p>
<p>On the Cisco:</p>
<pre>
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2,100,101
switchport nonegotiate
</pre>
<p>On the Dell:</p>
<pre>
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2,100,101
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uminac.com/2009/04/26/vlan-trunking-cisco-vsdell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
